JCH Spotlight, The Resident Connection, Written Posts

Apartment Marketing Cited Source Comparison

22 Comments 24 August 2011

So, who’s getting the biggest slice of the pie?  As budget season approaches I’m doing my mid-year study of marketing data that we collect here at J.C. Hart.  In the past I have mentioned how I think it’s important to not just review data month over month, but to also look at it year over year and over a series of years.  I typically will look back 4 years and also pull year-to-date numbers to see if we have any trends for the current year as well.  What’s most interesting about my analysis this year is that 2007 was the last year before our big shift to online and social media.  We’d always had a company website and we’ve listed on numerous ILSs for years, but we really began to shift our marketing investment in 2008. The following data is a summary of all J.C. Hart Apartment Communities leasing records for 1st marketing source cited by a new move-in.

Back in 2007 you will see that Print Guide marketing contributed a little over 10% of our leasing, and the ILSs contributed nearly 20%.  Unfortunately, nearly 60% of our marketing spend was going to Print Guides and ILSs.  At this time, Craigslist was barely a blip on the radar, but we saw the majority of our leases coming from good old Drive By and Referrals.  When I looked at these numbers back in 2007 I remember thinking to myself, “Self, why do we spend most of our marketing $ on these sources and nearly nothing on Drive By, Referrals, or our own Property Websites?”  It was somewhat of an epiphany for me.  What else could we do with that money?  We did have property websites in 2007 (that I thought were great at the time), but they were only cited by 1.4% of our new move-ins.  Something definitely needed to be done there.  Bottom line, the spend seemed oddly weighted, and I knew there had to be a better way.

So onward we went into 2008 with a new plan.  That plan included dropping one print source and reinvesting about 50% of that savings into: beginning a new website initiative, starting to use Google Adwords, and the beginning of our strategy to incorporate social media into our marketing.  In addition, we launched test properties using a revenue management system for our pricing.  It was kind of amazing what else we could do with those dollars.  The shift wasn’t dramatic, but we began to see our Property Websites and Referrals make up for the downward trending Print Guides.

In 2009 the real shift happened.  We saw our Property Websites completely cover and take over for what was once attributed to print for our leases.  We had dropped another Print Guide that year and invested into more website tools, more social media efforts, more Adwords, began some basic strategy Craigslist posting, and we also added some additional ILS listings we had not previously been in.  Our Property Website leases jumped from 5.7% to 10.6% of the marketing sources, Referrals 24.7% to 26.9%, and ILSs 16.2% to 17.7%.

And then just last year in 2010 we began to reduce our spend with ILSs and adopted a strategist Craigslist plan using the RentSentinel Marketer tool.  All-the-while investing more into social media as well.

So the shift had happened.  That 10.5% of leases attributed to Print Guides in 2007 was now all covered by our Property Websites, and the ILS cited leases went from 19% in 2007 to 14.7% but were easily covered by our Craigslist efforts.  I did make the assumption that being in the Print Guides did help drive traffic to the correlating ILSs as well back in 2007, so I do not conclude that the effectiveness of an ILS has gone down.  However, even though all is not necessarily equal, I also do not conclude that the ILSs have necessary improved in driving leases over the past 4 years either.

Of all the numbers, the one I am watching the closest is the Referrals.  Up from 20.3% of the leases in 2007 to 28.9% in 2010.  While we may have traded leases with our improved website and by having a better Craigslist strategy, the Referral number is something I know our company is proud of.  We’ve built a company and communities that others want to share and talk about.  As I see our Google Analytics traffic report more an more traffic from Facebook and Twitter, I can only imagine how the power of social media has impacted this number directly or indirectly as well.  The power of sharing online and getting referrals is something I feel is critical to a company’s marketing.  This helped offset the reduced Drive By citings in our records, and we couldn’t be happier to see that.

The trend so far in 2011 is definitely shaping up to be interesting as well.  ILSs continue to decrease as a result of us dropping Rent.com’s services, but our Property Websites are trending up to 13.7% from 10.6% and Search Engines as sources in general have gone up from 7.8% to 10.4% of the mix.   Those are definitely numbers I’m watching as our website traffic increase year over year correlates to this statistic.

Obviously there is more than one way to skin a cat.  What I think is most important to point out here is the continued increase in the Property Website category, and why social media, search engine optimization, and online marketing in general can be huge factors to lead people where you want them to find you.  Your Property Website should be the best way for people to learn about your communities and what you have to offer, and I truly believe that your marketing investments should target areas to help drive people there.

If you would like ideas for how you can shift your marketing and build a better online strategy I’d love to help.   Please let me know.

  • http://twitter.com/barbri Brian Barfield

    Very interesting look at how far multifamily marketing has changed- I am curious, how would the pie looked if you took away “Drive By”.

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      Brian, good question.  I know for our properties we’ll always have Drive By (at least until someone invents the transporter).  In surveying our customers further we find this is still something that people definitely do, or just do as a result of driving past us on a regular basis during their commute or route to the store.  Drive By has definitely gone down (likely due to digital media advancements), but I think it will continue to be a factor as some portion of the pie.  If it continues to decrease, however, we all need to have a plan to recover that traffic.

  • http://www.thetrainingfactor.com/ Jonathan Saar

    This is absolutely fantastic data to live and breathe by Mark.  Just a couple of years ago so many people said it would not work or were on the fence about it.  You and your teams efforts and goals clearly show the shift that has happened on how people connect.  Thanks for sharing your data.

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      The data says a lot of things, and I feel like we get so much more for our money.  Thank J.

  • Pingback: Apartment Marketing Cited Source Comparison – Mark Juleen | 2 to 4 Units

  • Mdhaggerty

    There is nothing here about lead volume and the process used to track leads which may have changed during these years. The percentages just show your proactive shift in marketing sources and the means you drove prospects to your community information.

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      Yes, I was trying to highlight the shift in marketing sources.  The data is based off of move-ins and not leads.  The way we recorded and tracked these sources did not change.  With the leasing variables for the portfolio (ie – renewal rate, number of units in the portfolio, etc.) the bottom line leasing numbers are not really relevant.  We maintained average occupancy from 92-95% during this period and continue to maintain that occupancy while trending up.

      One point I want to make with this is that the volume of leads does not necessarily matter as long as you are getting quality leads that actually lease.

      Thanks for the question/comment!

  • Anonymous

    Bravo to to you and your team Mark, having an almost 30% referral rate is outstanding. How is that measured, just what the prospect tells you, or referral bonus/fees, if you even do that.

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      It’s based off first source cited in our system.  We collect that information by asking or from a prospect stating it on a digital guest card.  We do offer a referral fee of $100 and have not adjusted that value in the last 7 years.  One factor that goes into this referral number that we like is when competitors refer people to us.  We do not pay them a fee.  :)

  • http://www.apartments.com Jmaher

    I find it interesting that the data for ILSs includes Rent.com, a locator, pay-for-performance model.  Internet Listing Services, being a flat-fee model shouldn’t be lumped in with locators.  There is a different model, and cost structure involved.  As far as a shift in increased use of property websites, don’t forget that Apartments.com drives a ton of traffic to our customer websites!  Believe me, this is a huge value as we’re spending the dollars to drive traffic to their websites with our SEO/SEM.  Savvy marketers and owners get the VALUE in our linking to their community and management websites!  This is something that our competitors rarely do.  Espescially Rent.com, because they want to be paid for the locator fee.  That’s my 2-cents.  It would be good to seperate ILS’s from Locators.  We’re growning, and can help our communities maximize their investment by sending renters to their sites (to see their information, fill out an application, etc…).

    Janice Maher
    Advertising Consultant – Southwest Michigan/Northern Indiana
    jmaher@apartments.com

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      Janice, it’s all perspective I suppose.  In no way do I view Rent.com as a locator.  A locator is an actual person that assists someone in finding an apartment.  Rent.com is just another listing site.  I don’t view them as a locator just because they have a performance based billing model.  I will always define Rent.com as an ILS and believe any apartment marketer should.

      In defense of ILSs.  I agree.  There are some ILSs that help to drive traffic to company websites.  We still use Apartments.com, ApartmentGuide.com, ForRent.com, Rentwiki.com, and ApartmentRatings.com to help drive this traffic.  However, some of these sites are now producing fewer click throughs than Facebook in a few cases for our properties.

      So here’s the question to the ILSs then.  What’s the goal of the ILS?  To drive traffic to a company/property website, or to keep people on their site searching for apartments?  I think we’ll get mixed answers from each, and we’d get mixed answers from companies that list with them.

      Thanks for the input!

      • http://www.apartments.com Jmaher

        Thank you for your response Mark, I appreciate it and know how important perspective can be in this complicated world of marketing/advertising…
        From my perspective, having run several apartment locators, spent several years as a leasing agent, Property Manager and worked for an ILS for since 1997 I think I have a pretty good idea of how an ILS and a locator work and their differences.  And if you look at Apartments.com’s competitors you’ll find that most of them DO NOT offer to link to a community or property website.  There is a huge value here.  One that I don’t think it’s smart to look past.  As we are spending the dollars and time to send prospects to our customers, so they can see their websites.  This is an expensive proposition for management companies to do on thier own.  So when you say that more management companies are spending more money on thier websites, and this is netting more traffic.  It’s very important to give credit where it’s due.  Just sayin’…

        • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

          From my statistics I am absolutely giving credit where credit is due, and I don’t appreciate the “Just sayin’.”  J.C. Hart owes very little credit to ILSs for our property website traffic growth.  For example, in reviewing our Google Analytics comparing same YTD periods in 2009 to 2011 our click throughs to our company website from Apartments.com has actually decreased.  And we’ve added 2 additional properties to Apartments.com since 2009.  

          To your point about management companies doing it on their own being expensive, I have to disagree.  We’ve done all of this work building better websites, utilizing social media, and building a bigger online presence all while reducing our marketing spend in the process.

          That’s my experience, why I shared this data, and think management companies can get more creative with their marketing spend to produce better results over time.

          • http://www.ashtonglen-fms.com Mindy Sharp

            Amen. I have a property of 108 units. People lease apartments off our website 20% of the time.  I think it is a great return on our tiny budget! I have always told the Corporate Office/Owner our little property competes very well with some of the big boys out there! I track our leads and sources of our leases daily. We, too, are thrilled with our Referral rates, almost 12%.   

          • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

            Thanks Mindy!  Congrats on your achievements!!!

  • Jen Piccotti

    Good stuff, Mark! Out of curiosity, where do you classify rating and review sources, such as ApartmentRatings.com or Yelp!? Is that classified with Search Engines & Social? I’ve seen those sometimes classified as ILS, so I thought I’d clarify so I don’t mis-interpret.
    Thanks!

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      Yes, we categorize that with search engines and social as they are not necessarily designed to be an advertisement for our properties.  For the last 5 years, at least, that’s the way we’ve categorized them.  I do think we could see some of that change in how measure those sites, but I also anticipate seeing the ILSs embracing ratings and reviews at some point so that will throw a wrench in things. :)

  • Kim Cory

    I’m curious on your student properties Mark.  I have just done the same analysis like you have and it looks much different on the source types as well as the shift.  Would you be willing to share with me a break down for just the student specific properties? Student Housing is so different and in 2007 we were already getting a good deal of traffic directly to our website.  Where I’ve noticed the biggest shift from 2007-2010 is the internet search (Google, Bing, Yahoo, Facebook, For Rent, Apartment Ratings).  These sources contributed to an 8% growth in referring sources that closed into leases.  Would be happy to share more details with you! 

    • http://www.markjuleen.com Mark Juleen

      We saw referrals and property website cited leases nearly double in 4 years at our student property.  In Bloomington we’ve never had success with the ILSs.  What’s interesting with this analysis in general is that I’m looking at closed leases and not leads with these numbers.  While we may have leads from these other sources, the prospects that actually lease have shifted away from giving credit to them.  Thus, the conclusions that I am coming to lead me to believe that investing in referral strategies and driving traffic to our own websites is the better investment right now.

      • Kim Cory

        The study I have done this week was also by closed leases, not leads.  In 2007 & 2010 the property website & referrals were the leaders for closed leases, so not a huge shift over the past 3 years for us in sources who drive closed leads.  What’s interesting is when looking through Google analytics for our property website, Facebook continues to be a top 5 driving source of traffic yet no one cited Facebook on their application as how they found us.  Back in 2007 Facebook drove little to none traffic to our website. This is where I am seeing the largest shift in how they are getting to my website and who are the top leaders to drive that traffic.  Like you, my strategies have always been to get the traffic onto my own website no matter where they find me online.  With an average of 25,000 unique visitors each month, I would say the website is critical and will continue to be a strong asset to our marketing efforts.  Great to hear your success with referrals and property website in Bloomington!    

  • Pingback: Best of MarkJuleen.com 2011 | Mark Juleen

  • Pingback: Apartment Marketing Cited Source Comparison – 2011 Update | Mark Juleen

Enter your email address:

Mark Juleen on Facebook

@mbj tweets

A Must Read

© 2012 Mark Juleen. Powered by WordPress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium WordPress Themes